Gil Troy is an American academic. He received his undergraduate, graduate and doctoral degrees from Harvard University and is a professor of History at McGill University.
The author of eleven books, nine of which concern American presidential history, and one of which concerns his own and others' "Jewish identity," he contributes regularly to a variety of publications and appears frequently in the media as a commentator and analyst on subjects relating to history and politics. Twitter: @GilTroy. Website: www.giltroy.com.
The terrorist bombings in Saudi Arabia and Morocco should alarm the Muslim world, showing that there is no good and bad terrorism
By Gil Troy
Montreal Gazette
May 21, 2003
The tragic triple suicide bombings in Saudi Arabia, followed by the weekend attacks in Morocco, should alarm the Muslim world. Just as the terrorists did not distinguish between Saudis and Americans, between Moroccans and Europeans, the world cannot distinguish between "good" and "bad" terror. Terrorism as a tactic must be denounced broadly, not selectively. It should not be relativized; it must be delegitimized.
Although it risks bad manners to mock people in mourning, anyone with a good memory had to be struck by Crown Prince Abdullah's denunciation of the "criminal butchers" who attacked the three compounds. "These tragic events should serve as a warning to the unwary and should restore sanity to the deluded," Abdullah said. "The perpetrators are but a small group of deviants whose objective is to do harm to our society by doing damage to its security."
Unfortunately, for years now, the crown prince's kingdom and too many Islamic leaders have been perpetuating the mass "delusion" that terrorism is not only legitimate but holy. Billions of Saudi petro-dollars have funded recruitment campaigns to ensure that such "butchers" are anything "but a small group of deviants." Saudis - and too many other Muslims - have financed, implemented, rationalized and consecrated terror. They have raised money for terror under the guise of widow-and-orphan funds from Riyadh to Rabat, from Marseilles to Montreal. They have encouraged many of their youth to attend training camps to learn how to build suicide bombs, how to fill these death packs with nails to maximize the maiming, how to lace the shrapnel with rat poison to intensify bleeding.
Perpetuating the lie that suicide bombers - when aimed at the "right" target - are "martyrs not murderers," theses leaders' diplomats have praised suicide bombings on the front pages of London newspapers, their professors have honoured students who killed rather than learned, their populace has worshiped mass-murderers with the same adulation the decadent Westerners expend on rock stars. And their religious leaders have developed a cult of martyrdom, hijacking a religion in the service of an odious ideology of death, distorting key ideas to feed hate and foment violence.
Of course, terrorism was supposed to be aimed at "legitimate" targets - Israeli kids munching pizza, American secretaries booting word processors, Australian teenagers bogeying in a nightclub. By exporting terror, the Saudi kingdom was supposed to be buying a certain immunity from it. In the more moderate Kingdom of Morocco, until this weekend, terrorism was something that happened elsewhere. But is anyone surprised that such a tactic, once perfected and applauded, could not be controlled? A society that can so demonize the "other" as to celebrate enemy deaths, risks distorting its political culture. A political culture that celebrates wading into crowds or apartment compounds and blowing up civilians wherever they might be, whoever they are, risks teaching its members that when arguments fail, it is OK to resort to violence, even against your neighbours.
Terrorism is so morally problematic because it is deliberate yet indiscriminate. Whereas one mourns the deaths of soldiers and of civilians in war, terrorism seeks out civilians when they are doing what civilians do - working, playing, shopping, eating, sleeping - and often targets the weakest members of society, women in markets, children at play, old men on a bus.
Although it is easy to moralize about Saudi Arabian and Moroccan hypocrisies, we need to acknowledge our own inconsistencies. The Canadian government's softness for Hezbollah and Hamas, reflected most recently in immigration authorities' branding as a war criminal a refugee who helped fight against Hezbollah in southern Lebanon, implicates us all. The people purporting to be peace protesters who march with signs legitimizing suicide bombers by saying "martyrs not murderers," thus celebrating murder, shame us all. No civilized person can delight in the dozens killed in Riyadh or Casablanca. But as one awaits condemnation from the Arab world of the latest wave of Hamas suicide bombings aimed at aborting U.S. President George W. Bush's peace initiative, one can hope that some good will result. Perhaps now, the leaders of Islam are ready to lead the fight against terror. Perhaps they are ready to purge their ranks of those who encourage terrorism and those who soft-pedal it.
There is no longer a need for an appeal based on idealism. The sociopaths who slit a Casablanca doorman's throat, the cars that detonated throughout Riyadh and Casablanca, the bomb that exploded in a Yemeni court days after a judge sentenced an Al-Qa'ida terrorist to death, demonstrate that this is a matter of life and death. Supporting terrorism comes with no immunity clause - those who support terror today risk being terrorist targets tomorrow.
It has been nearly one year since this article was posted to this site.
As of April 10, 2004, the title continues to hold true in that "Nobody Is Safe."
So how and when will this "clash of civilizations" between the Arab world and Western culture come to a peaceful end? Will it ever be possible to restore any semblance of peace in the near future or is this just the beginning of an "apocalyptic" re-emergence of an ideology that has proclaimed that it should be the one to dominate world governance?
Just as other ideologies whose goal was to instill world governance have risen and fallen, ie. Roman Empire, Nazi Germany, Japanese Imperialism, Communism, etc., mankind has not yet found the answer on how to live peaceably with one another. The clash of civilizations continues to this day.
Fast forward to this 21st century and one will realize that the present clash of civilizations actually began in the seventh century when the Islamic prophet, Muhammad, instructed his followers to resort to war and terror in order to convert the world to the Islamic religion. For example:
“The Prophet (peace be upon him) said: I am commanded to fight with men till they testify that there is no god but Allah, and that Muhammad is His servant and His Apostle, face our qiblah (direction of prayer), eat what we slaughter, and pray like us. When they do that, their life and property are unlawful for us except what is due to them. They will have the same rights as the Muslims have, and have the same responsibilities as the Muslims have.” (Sunan Abu-Dawud, Book 14, Number 2635, Narrated Anas ibn Malik)
“Yahya related to me…that the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, stimulated people for jihad and mentioned the Garden (Paradise). (Malik Muwatta, Book 21, Number 21.18.42)
Those are just two examples among hundreds. The mindset of the Muslim world has been established so as to make it an obligation to give all that one has to give, including their life, in order to help Islam become the only religious, social and political ideology that controls the world.
It appears that as long as Muslim clerics continue to view Jews, Christians, and the modern world (Western and Secular societies) as an enemy to be destroyed, it may be a long time before a peaceful solution can ever be achieved. Until then, one must agree; "Nobody Is Safe."
As Golda Meir said "when you (the PA) love your children more than you hate us..." only THEN will we all be safe.
the use of the word "nobody" on the original article struck a chord with me. To the PA people are just tools, a means to an end. And suicide for the cause is the quick route to heaven. This ideological split is hard for many of us to get our heads around. To us, our people & our land is what is important. To the Muslim clerics - the CAUSE is what is important.
Until they learn to VALUE PEOPLE (yes BOTH men & women) rather than the CAUSE - Nobody Is Safe.
View previous topic • View next topic 
